Streamline fuzzer workflow - #9749
3 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2166 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 206 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | random_i8[0.5] |
67.2 µs | 90.7 µs | -25.91% |
| ❌ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar_avx2[65536] |
8.3 µs | 9.4 µs | -11.86% |
| ❌ | Simulation | allocate_drop_bytes[0] |
466 ns | 520.2 ns | -10.41% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | random_i16[0.95] |
94.4 µs | 76.4 µs | +23.54% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_avx512[16384] |
21.4 µs | 17.6 µs | +21.34% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_avx2[16384] |
21.3 µs | 17.6 µs | +20.73% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/fuzzci (02cbe21) with develop (792cef7)
Footnotes
-
206 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩