Conversation
|
@Annoor24 Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
|
The matrix is useful, but the checker concatenates every source page and only proves each ID appears somewhere. A value under the wrong chain or contract still passes. Please compare each row to its owning manifest entry, including its version. |
|
The conflict resolution did not fix the checker. It still combines every source page and only checks whether an ID appears anywhere. Please validate each chain, contract, and version against its owning manifest entry. |
|
@truthixify Reworked the checker so it validates each row against its owning entry, and resolved the merge conflict.
It no longer concatenates the source pages and greps for an ID. Each chain section now has a named owner, and every row is resolved to its contract's entry in that owner:
It fails when a row's contract has no owning entry, when the value is not that contract's value, when the value belongs to a different chain or contract, when the version does not match the registry, or when the owner publishes a value but the matrix marks the row pending. It also builds a global identifier → (chain, contract) index, so a value placed under the wrong chain or contract is caught rather than passing because it appears somewhere. What the stricter check caught (and I fixed) Run against the previous page, it flagged the CKB table: I also confirmed it now rejects the two failure modes you named — a value under the wrong chain ( Conflict resolved
|
Overview
There was no single place that said which Wraith SDK entry point, framework package versions, contract versions, and on-chain deployment IDs belong together. The per-chain contracts pages, the SDK overview and the Stellar network reference each held one slice of the answer, so readers had to infer the combinations themselves.
reference/compatibility-matrix.mdxnow publishes that matrix for EVM, Stellar, Solana and CKB: the SDK core version pins, theChainenum value and entry point for each chain, the curve and optional peer dependency each entry point needs, the deployed identifiers, and a per-chain migration-notes section. Every row links to the page that owns its deployment IDs and to the migration guidance for that chain, and a new CI check keeps the matrix from drifting from the deployment references it transcribes.Related Issue
Changes
[ADD]
reference/compatibility-matrix.mdx@wraith-protocol/sdk^1.4.5and the@noble/curves,@noble/hashesandviemdependency roles.Chainenum value, SDK entry point, curve, framework/peer packages, and links to that chain's deployment IDs and migration notes.[ADD]
scripts/check-compatibility-matrix.mjscontracts/*.mdx,reference/stellar-networks.mdxor thesdk/chains/*.mdxprimitives pages, so a matrix row cannot disagree with the deployment reference that owns it.[MODIFY]
docs.jsonreference/compatibility-matrixin the Reference navigation group.[MODIFY]
package.jsoncheck:compatibility-matrixand includes it innpm testalongsidecheck:snippetsandcheck:nav-coverage.Verification Results
scripts/check-compatibility-matrix.mjscross-checks every identifier in the page against the deployment reference that owns it, and runs innpm testCloses #155