docs: add Dynamic Foraging Behavior V2 pipeline

[arjunsridhar12345]

Attempts to close #212

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://scicomp-docs--213.org.readthedocs.build/en/213/

[dougollerenshaw]

Before approving, I'm a bit apprehensive to refer to it as the "Dynamic Foraging Behavior V2" pipeline. Are you using "V2" to identify it as being compliant with v2 metadata schema? If so, I don't think that's the right choice because presumably we'll continue to keep this pipeline up to date with future metadata schema versions as opposed to making new pipelines. I don't think the pipeline should be named for the metadata schema.

The associated repo is just called the "dynamic-foraging-processing-pipeline" To me, that is a more sensible name. Once the legacy pipeline is deprecated, there will just be a single Dynamic Foraging pipeline, right? Though until that happens, I can see how this will continue to be confusing.

What do you think makes the most sense here?

[arjunsridhar12345]

Before approving, I'm a bit apprehensive to refer to it as the "Dynamic Foraging Behavior V2" pipeline. Are you using "V2" to identify it as being compliant with v2 metadata schema? If so, I don't think that's the right choice because presumably we'll continue to keep this pipeline up to date with future metadata schema versions as opposed to making new pipelines. I don't think the pipeline should be named for the metadata schema.

The associated repo is just called the "dynamic-foraging-processing-pipeline" To me, that is a more sensible name. Once the legacy pipeline is deprecated, there will just be a single Dynamic Foraging pipeline, right? Though until that happens, I can see how this will continue to be confusing.

What do you think makes the most sense here?

agree, keeping it the same name as the repo is the most sensible I think. I used v2 to imply the metadata but also the fact that its a new acquisition system which can also be confusing, but that's covered in the pipeline readme so I think it makes sense to do what you suggested and just use the sensible name (the name of the repo - dynamic-foraging-processing-pipeline)

[dougollerenshaw]

Sounds good. Hopefully we can get the old pipeline shut off soon so there will truly be just one Dynamic Foraging pipeline.

[arjunsridhar12345]

looking at the read the docs page here

Should the name then just be Dynamic Foraging Behavior like the other ones?

[dougollerenshaw]

looking at the read the docs page here

Should the name then just be Dynamic Foraging Behavior like the other ones?

I think that makes a lot of sense. It's consistent with the others, and it also implicitly disambiguates it from the legacy pipeline since the legacy pipeline handled both behavior and FIP, whereas this name makes it clear that it's behavior-only.

[dougollerenshaw]

Thanks!