docs: maintain durable product-technical gap baseline - #100
seonghobae wants to merge 233 commits into
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough제품·기술 격차 기준을 2026-09-16 기준의 durable commercialization baseline으로 재작성했다. 보호된 Changes제품·기술 격차 기준
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: 🔵 Low · up to The baseline can still permit inconsistent Talent denominator interpretation and make supporting research evidence harder to reproduce, but these are bounded documentation risks rather than immediate runtime failures. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@opencode-agent Please review the current unchanged head against protected |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
|
|
|
|
Volatile implementation authority update only: #434 is now exact |
|
This strengthens the existing fail-closed canary but does not change |
|
Baseline authority currentization: #434 advanced test-only to exact Accordingly |
|
A future baseline source write is warranted when #435 changes durable buyer-visible state or dependency ownership—for example when protected/released composition can actually reconstruct/re-admit immutable generation state across restart and activate/rollback it—not merely because the Draft representation contract exists. |
|
2026-09-22 API-01 authority currentization only; no baseline source write. Draft #436 is now exact Buyer-visible closure still requires durable deployment/activation/rollback/recovery authority, deployable HTTP composition, released Keyverse/ACL and owner-operation evidence, canonical exact-head execution/security/review, protected adoption, release evidence and realistic end-to-end performance. Therefore |
|
Baseline handoff: no |
|
2026-09-22 API-01 currentization only; no baseline source write. Durable state remains Planned because protected/released buyer capability has not changed. Draft implementation has advanced from process-local #434 into #436 durable generation/configuration and #437 durable activation/re-admission. #437 exact is These are acceptance-invariant improvements, not a buyer-visible gap-state transition. Keep |
|
Current dependent implementation evidence: #436 remains exact This strengthens Draft fail-closed authority direction but does not change protected/released buyer capability. #437 still has no canonical PR-triggered workflow run or independent review on its exact head, #433 remains Proposed, #340 CodeQL remains red, and Orgmetra has no published GitHub Release. Keep |
|
Gap-baseline handoff only; do not change protected baseline state from this comment. Draft #437 advanced to exact |
|
#437 current durable-state handoff: exact head This is a Draft implementation invariant, not a durable buyer-visible state change. |
|
Live implementation authority has advanced beyond the body’s older exact heads: #434 is Architecture verification has improved: #433 exact |
|
Gap-baseline handoff: #437 advanced to exact Buyer-visible completion has not changed: #437 remains Draft without canonical exact-head Foundation/PostgreSQL execution, independent review, released external evidence, deployable HTTP composition host, or end-to-end p95 proof. Keep |
|
Baseline handoff only; no source rewrite requested from this lane. #437 exact When baseline state eventually changes, preserve the distinction between historical activation evidence and fresh recovery-attestation evidence; do not treat process-local recovery return values or Draft migration existence as Shipped truth. |
|
Gap-baseline handoff: #437 moved to exact |
|
Gap-baseline handoff only; no source write requested here. Draft composition hardening advanced #436 to |
|
Baseline handoff only; no source write requested from this lane. #437 exact |
|
Gap-baseline handoff only; no baseline source write requested. Draft #437 is now exact |
|
API-01 handoff only; no baseline-source write requested. Current Draft composition authority is #436 |
|
Baseline-owner handoff only; no baseline file edit from this lane. #437 exact |
|
Current downstream composition leaf is Draft #446 exact This improves Draft HTTP correctness but does not create a protected deployable composition application, immutable released Keyverse/Orgmetra/owner authority, canonical exact-tree package/PostgreSQL acceptance, authenticated owner dispatch, cleanup/recovery, immutable release, or full buyer-path p95 evidence. Keep the baseline source state Planned and preserve #100 single-writer ownership; volatile exact heads remain live GitHub authority. |
Scope
Canonical single-writer lane for
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md. The baseline is a durable commercialization map, not merge authorization: it records protected/released truth and explicit Planned/Active gaps without promoting Draft implementation to shipped capability. Volatile workflow IDs, queue states, mergeability and reviews remain live GitHub truth.Current authority — 2026-09-22
develop@eb9757f8649aaad026a9865508d9aad50c1a7a4f.aeacd8deda19f878d802c70b77c65912fb4a6e7e, open · Draft.API-01remains Planned under product/platform(api): establish one deployable Orgmetra product-composition boundary #432. Its durable gap state has not changed, so this lane does not rewrite baseline source merely to enumerate implementation commits.912fa44ec3b928500acea0291103cb41f6a6d7fc, 42 commits / 3 documentation files. ADR 0432 remains Proposed. Fresh exact-head Foundation/SAST/Security/CodeQL runs were newly queued after material source writes, so predecessor GREEN does not transfer; independent review remains absent.9ced14ae97f8c07285cdc3975f57a81c717313a2, stacked on fix(ci): run setup-node on Node 24 action runtime #340 exact28f2bd28414e217f7e848ba86c0cfdbe97fd518f, with 110 commits / 17 files confined toservices/product-composition-api/**.Durable gap states
ASM-01,INT-01, andVAL-01keep their existing owner paths.API-01remains Planned through #432, Proposed architecture #433 and bounded executable canary #434. Shared-edge configuration, structural admission, or process-local evidence integrity alone does not close the buyer-visible Gateway gap.API-01current interpretationProtected Architecture/API truth advertises a buyer-facing Orgmetra Gateway while protected executable truth still lacks a supported deployable product-composition boundary.
The durable ownership model remains optional released shared-edge transport plus a separately deployable Orgmetra product-composition application. Composition owns product route admission and request-scoped projection only, not HR truth, Person binding, purpose authorization, owner idempotency/replay/concurrency/error semantics, or scientific truth.
#434 contributes acceptance invariants without changing the Planned gap state: canonical receipt/source binding; owner/upstream/release agreement; one exact owner release per service/generation; constructor/pre-hash/generation/use-time nested-evidence revalidation; process-local owner-release, route, and generation construction integrity without durable-lineage overclaim; deterministic receipt ordering; OpenAPI path-key identity separated from Path Item ownership, deterministic path matching and HTTP operation authority; GET/HEAD selected-resource collision handling; one exact owner release per Path Item; canonical 1..64-character lower-snake-case owner/route/generation identity with an equivalent hyphenated
service://projection; and canonical 1..64 lower-snake-case path-template expressions without empty underscore segments.Latest construction-integrity evidence is split deliberately:
OwnerApiRelease:0637353074d19327940b72821d497ffba131c284 -> 747c2a7a105e3abf23f8ddfbcb5b662f17e61924 -> 6744a55e95073b2c3f8572c62b84e555f580146a;CompositionRoute:5935135daf9eb2a89bcfd32e32105d9bd9563f96 -> 946d0a25faf5759233fb0aabeaf61f2fac653740 -> 9ced14ae97f8c07285cdc3975f57a81c717313a2.These reject low-level valid-to-valid retargeting of an already-constructed value while allowing legitimately new values to represent new semantics. They remain process-local integrity mechanisms, not durable release/configuration/deployment authority.
This strengthens existing fail-closed exact-evidence semantics but does not change
API-01from Planned and does not make the canary shipped capability; baseline source therefore remains intentionally unchanged.A separate verification dependency remains explicit: canonical Foundation does not currently discover/execute
services/product-composition-api, so repository-level service discovery/runtime acceptance remains #260 after its declared prerequisites. Product-composition has no runtime dependencies and declares Python>=3.11; canonical discovery must eventually execute that truthful support or change it only from owner evidence, not runner convenience.Shipment still requires released Keyverse/ACL and owner API/operation evidence, durable non-reassignable generation/config/deployment activation authority, canonical Foundation execution of the service, a deployable HTTP composition host, activation/rollback re-admission, fault/security/recovery evidence, supported Kubernetes packaging, and realistic asynchronous
[shared edge if deployed] -> composition -> owner HTTP -> PostgreSQLk6/E2E with applicable p95 <=20 ms.Baseline write rule
Planned/Active work belongs in baseline source when it changes durable buyer/scientific gap state or owner dependency and is explicitly labeled. A Draft PR, local result, ADR or metadata update never becomes Shipped truth merely by being recorded. Conversely, commit churn that does not change durable state stays in owner PR/issue authority rather than repeatedly rewriting this baseline.
This branch remains the only writer for
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md. Future source currentization must preserve truth-state distinctions, exact owner boundaries, causal stack order, standards-profile scope, canonical identity grammar, process-local evidence integrity versus durable provenance, and fail-closed external-contract semantics.