Skip to content

repair(ci): format consolidated supply-chain policy test - #1176

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 7 commits into
developfrom
bolt-performance-chart-export-13223013812255847379
Draft

seonghobae wants to merge 7 commits into
developfrom
bolt-performance-chart-export-13223013812255847379

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Repair finding

Protected develop@314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e contains a Ruff-formatting defect introduced with repository-workflow consolidation. The only live delta is services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py; exact head 8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23 remains OPEN / Draft / mergeable, one changed file (+1/-3). No product behavior, dependency, audio/MIR, filesystem, model, release, gate or assertion semantics change.

Exact-head evidence

Repository-owned exact-head runs remain terminal SUCCESS for ci 34072437377, build-baseline 34072437358, sbom 34072437378, Security Scan 34072437423, and SAST Semgrep 34072437368.

CodeQL PR 34072437359 remains terminal FAILURE from the delegated central lifecycle, not this formatter source. No qualifying independent non-author current-head APPROVED exists, so Ready is not justified.

Central prerequisite authority

.github#2352 exact f1a8dc813e6dba4e4905bf3e1b770b6d44344944 is the current CodeQL integration authority. Its producer completed exact analysis and Medium+ SARIF gating but fails GHAS base/head configuration-identity verification because code-scanning/analyses returns HTTP 403 Resource not accessible by integration. This is not a BandScope source finding and clean SARIF alone is not sufficient acceptance.

Canonical identity repair remains .github#2275 fail-closed analyses-read credential selection plus .github#2276 target-repository permission/canary. Those lanes depend on the central admission/runtime chain reaching protected authority.

The first current prerequisite is .github#2286@42e4198fa012eb24596e7984d77e27f0905348d6, which breaks the former #2278/#2286 cycle by retaining the five coverage-owner paths and adopting #2278's AnyIO 4.14.2 delta through ordinary two-parent ancestry. Fresh exact-head evidence is now SUCCESS for SAST Semgrep, Runtime Quality, Python Security, and Security Scan; CodeQL remains queued. Independent approval and a post-repair real coverage-image canary are still missing, so #2286 remains Draft.

#2291 waits for verified/protected #2286 before ordinary reconciliation; #2109 remains Draft behind #2291. The current foundation order is #2286 -> protected integration -> #2291 reconcile/accept/integrate -> #2109 reconcile/accept/integrate -> #2275/#2276 -> verified #2352 lifecycle -> this BandScope formatter lane. Do not duplicate any of those central source deltas here.

Downstream ownership

Product/scientific/CI lanes consume this formatter prerequisite through ordinary ancestry rather than a second formatter writer. This includes #1254 shared timing, #970 Project Persistence transitively via #1254, #910 Workspace/GrooveMap, #1228 Signal-MIR preregistration, and now #944 Rust/toolchain generic-CI owner.

Fresh hosted RCA on #944 predecessor 10e369ec1e58da1ae6c132e7c33e80f6d6683b81 reached exact source and failed only because ruff format --check src tests reported this file would be reformatted. #944 therefore adopted this exact owner through ordinary two-parent descendant db0b7709f48161ca74ff6402ee5f75e136fea40c and retargeted its PR base to this branch. Its effective diff remains 16 Rust/CI-owned files; this formatter file is not an active #944 delta. That downstream stack is Draft and does not make this prerequisite released/protected authority.

Generated preservation continuations that reintroduced or removed the same formatter delta outside this lane remain repair findings, not new owners.

After this PR reaches protected ancestry, descendants must ordinary/non-force reconcile to current protected develop and reacquire exact-head/base evidence. Missing workflow generation is not GREEN.

Merge gate

Keep Draft until the central foundation/identity path above reaches protected authority with authentic terminal gates, this unchanged head receives authentic required CodeQL settlement, and a qualifying independent non-author current-head approval exists.

Protected agent_mention_router.py remains review-dispatch only; mention-only activity is not source repair or approval progress.

No self-approval, administrator bypass, force-push, destructive rebase, duplicate formatter fix, synthetic status, review dismissal, source-neutral wake commit, blind unchanged-head rerun, predecessor-evidence transfer or required-gate weakening.

…ks with O(1) dictionary key deduplication in chart export
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: e5c73fbc-66b9-44ef-8eda-cad744fa5d28

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 314ddea and a7b0030.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

워크플로 권한 검증 assertion의 줄바꿈 형식을 단일 줄로 변경했습니다. 테스트 조건과 동작은 유지했습니다.

Changes

Supply chain policy 테스트

Layer / File(s) Summary
권한 검증 assertion 형식 정리
services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py
권한 검증 assertion을 여러 줄 표현에서 단일 줄 표현으로 변경했습니다. 검증 조건은 동일합니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (매우 낮음) | ~2분

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to a7b00

This change only reformats a supply-chain policy test assertion without changing its validation behavior, so it presents no current product or deployment risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed PR 제목은 test_supply_chain_policy.py의 포맷 수정이라는 주요 변경을 정확히 설명합니다. 변경 범위와 목적이 명확하고 간결합니다.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch bolt-performance-chart-export-13223013812255847379

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Succession receipt: canonical #1076 is now repaired onto current protected develop@314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e through ordinary non-force two-parent adoption and exact head 4d154e6c1dcf840c0cbac76f789c30d58903b9e0 (behind_by=0, five owner files only). It carries this PR's useful insertion-ordered dictionary de-duplication for active role ids, display names, cue values, and priorities, plus stronger executable contracts for duplicate ordering, unhashable/hashable/truthiness-overriding string subclasses and normalized priority text. #1176's test_supply_chain_policy.py change is formatting-only and not part of the performance contract. The simpler production patch would weaken #1076's safe-failure boundary, so it is not adopted. No #1176 checks/reviews/statuses transfer. Closing unmerged is complete semantic succession.

@seonghobae seonghobae closed this Sep 6, 2026
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Succession receipt: canonical #1076 is now repaired onto current protected develop@314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e through ordinary non-force two-parent adoption and exact head 4d154e6c1dcf840c0cbac76f789c30d58903b9e0 (behind_by=0, five owner files only). It carries this PR's useful insertion-ordered dictionary de-duplication for active role ids, display names, cue values, and priorities, plus stronger executable contracts for duplicate ordering, unhashable/hashable/truthiness-overriding string subclasses and normalized priority text. #1176's test_supply_chain_policy.py change is formatting-only and not part of the performance contract. The simpler production patch would weaken #1076's safe-failure boundary, so it is not adopted. No #1176 checks/reviews/statuses transfer. Closing unmerged is complete semantic succession.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work has been succeeded by a different PR and this PR will be closed unmerged. Stopping work on this task.

@seonghobae seonghobae changed the title ⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Replace O(N^2) list membership checks with O(1) dictionary key deduplication in chart export repair(ci): format consolidated supply-chain policy test Sep 6, 2026
@seonghobae seonghobae reopened this Sep 6, 2026
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft September 6, 2026 22:07

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

Please review exact head a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd as a bounded inherited-base CI repair. The intended semantic delta is only Ruff formatting in services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py; .jules/bolt.md and exports/chart.py must remain byte-identical to protected develop@314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e. Please flag any semantic assertion change, ownership leakage back into chart export, or repository-control regression. Do not treat predecessor review/check evidence as current-head evidence.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

head_expected="a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd"
base="314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e"

printf '%s\n' '== Exact HEAD =='
git rev-parse HEAD
git cat-file -t "$head_expected"
git cat-file -t "$base"
printf '%s\n' '== HEAD matches requested commit =='
test "$(git rev-parse HEAD)" = "$head_expected" && echo yes || echo no
printf '%s\n' '== Base is an ancestor of requested head =='
git merge-base --is-ancestor "$base" "$head_expected" && echo yes || echo no

printf '%s\n' '== Name-status diff: protected develop -> requested head =='
git diff --name-status "$base" "$head_expected"
printf '%s\n' '== Summary diff =='
git diff --stat "$base" "$head_expected"

printf '%s\n' '== Byte identity checks =='
for path in .jules/bolt.md exports/chart.py; do
  if git cat-file -e "${base}:${path}" 2>/dev/null && git cat-file -e "${head_expected}:${path}" 2>/dev/null; then
    if git diff --quiet "$base" "$head_expected" -- "$path"; then
      printf '%s: identical\n' "$path"
    else
      printf '%s: DIFFERENT\n' "$path"
    fi
  else
    printf '%s: missing in base or head\n' "$path"
  fi
done

printf '%s\n' '== Repository-control paths changed =='
git diff --name-status "$base" "$head_expected" -- \
  '.github' '.github/**' '.jules' '.jules/**' \
  'pyproject.toml' 'ruff.toml' '.ruff.toml' \
  'package.json' 'package-lock.json' 'poetry.lock' 'uv.lock' \
  'requirements*.txt' 'Pipfile' 'Pipfile.lock' \
  'Dockerfile' 'docker-compose*.yml' 'Makefile' || true

printf '%s\n' '== Focused diff =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=80 "$base" "$head_expected" -- \
  services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py

printf '%s\n' '== Test file outline =='
ast-grep outline services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py --items all

Length of output: 22007


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

head="a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd"
base="314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e"

printf '%s\n' '== Patch whitespace validation =='
git diff --check "$base" "$head"

printf '%s\n' '== Word-level diff for the only modified test file =='
git diff --word-diff=porcelain --no-ext-diff "$base" "$head" -- \
  services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py

printf '%s\n' '== Tracked chart.py paths in base =='
git ls-tree -r --name-only "$base" | awk '(^|/)chart\.py$'
printf '%s\n' '== Tracked chart.py paths in requested head =='
git ls-tree -r --name-only "$head" | awk '(^|/)chart\.py$'

printf '%s\n' '== Diff for all tracked chart.py paths found in either tree =='
{
  git ls-tree -r --name-only "$base"
  git ls-tree -r --name-only "$head"
} | awk '(^|/)chart\.py$' | sort -u | while IFS= read -r path; do
  printf '%s\n' "--- $path"
  git diff --name-status "$base" "$head" -- "$path"
done

printf '%s\n' '== Changed paths outside the permitted test file =='
git diff --name-only "$base" "$head" | \
  awk '$0 != "services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py" { print }'

Length of output: 2542


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

head="a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd"
base="314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e"

base_paths="$(git ls-tree -r --name-only "$base" | grep -E '(^|/)chart\.py$' || true)"
head_paths="$(git ls-tree -r --name-only "$head" | grep -E '(^|/)chart\.py$' || true)"

printf '%s\n' '== Tracked chart.py paths in base =='
printf '%s\n' "${base_paths:-<none>}"
printf '%s\n' '== Tracked chart.py paths in requested head =='
printf '%s\n' "${head_paths:-<none>}"

printf '%s\n' '== Diff for all tracked chart.py paths =='
printf '%s\n%s\n' "$base_paths" "$head_paths" | sed '/^$/d' | sort -u | while IFS= read -r path; do
  printf '%s' "$path: "
  if git diff --quiet "$base" "$head" -- "$path"; then
    echo identical
  else
    echo DIFFERENT
    git diff --name-status "$base" "$head" -- "$path"
  fi
done

printf '%s\n' '== Exact requested exports/chart.py object status =='
for revision in "$base" "$head"; do
  if git cat-file -e "${revision}:exports/chart.py" 2>/dev/null; then
    echo "${revision}: present"
  else
    echo "${revision}: absent"
  fi
done

Length of output: 1719


@seonghobae No findings.

I verified exact head a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd against develop@314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e.

  • The base commit is an ancestor of the reviewed head.
  • Only services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py changed.
  • The changed assertion has identical operands and message. The change only removes Ruff formatter line breaks.
  • git diff --check reported no whitespace errors.
  • .jules/bolt.md is byte-identical.
  • The tracked chart export, services/analysis-engine/src/bandscope_analysis/exports/chart.py, is byte-identical.
  • exports/chart.py is not a tracked path in either tree.
  • No repository-control files changed.

This review uses current-head evidence only.

⚠️ Action not completed

Already reviewed the last commit. Use @coderabbitai full review to rerun a review of the entire changeset.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

Please review exact head 340b0a343ecfc05f630c7da729b8af40c7da4a2c. The tree is byte-identical to a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd; the head commit is an empty Trigger CI retry commit. Scope the review to the sole diff in services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py: verify that the Ruff-only formatting change preserves assertion semantics and that no superseded chart or workflow delta remains. Do not transfer predecessor approvals or checks.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

head="340b0a343ecfc05f630c7da729b8af40c7da4a2c"
predecessor="a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd"
base="314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e"
test_path="services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py"

printf '%s\n' '== Requested commit identity =='
printf 'checked-out HEAD: '; git rev-parse HEAD
printf 'requested head object: '; git cat-file -t "$head"
printf 'predecessor object: '; git cat-file -t "$predecessor"
printf 'base object: '; git cat-file -t "$base"
printf 'HEAD matches requested: '
test "$(git rev-parse HEAD)" = "$head" && echo yes || echo no

printf '%s\n' '== Empty retry commit verification =='
printf 'head tree: '; git rev-parse "${head}^{tree}"
printf 'predecessor tree: '; git rev-parse "${predecessor}^{tree}"
printf 'trees identical: '
test "$(git rev-parse "${head}^{tree}")" = "$(git rev-parse "${predecessor}^{tree}")" && echo yes || echo no
printf '%s\n' 'commit-level patch predecessor -> head:'
git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r "$predecessor" "$head"

printf '%s\n' '== Ancestry =='
printf 'base ancestor of head: '
git merge-base --is-ancestor "$base" "$head" && echo yes || echo no
printf 'predecessor ancestor of head: '
git merge-base --is-ancestor "$predecessor" "$head" && echo yes || echo no

printf '%s\n' '== Changed paths base -> head =='
git diff --name-status "$base" "$head"
printf '%s\n' '== Paths outside permitted test file =='
git diff --name-only "$base" "$head" | awk -v permitted="$test_path" '$0 != permitted {print}' || true

printf '%s\n' '== Focused semantic diff =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --unified=30 "$base" "$head" -- "$test_path"
printf '%s\n' '== Word diff =='
git diff --no-ext-diff --word-diff=porcelain "$base" "$head" -- "$test_path"
printf '%s\n' '== Whitespace validation =='
git diff --check "$base" "$head"

printf '%s\n' '== Prohibited path identity =='
for path in \
  .jules/bolt.md \
  exports/chart.py \
  services/analysis-engine/src/bandscope_analysis/exports/chart.py; do
  printf '%s: ' "$path"
  if git cat-file -e "${base}:${path}" 2>/dev/null && git cat-file -e "${head}:${path}" 2>/dev/null; then
    git diff --quiet "$base" "$head" -- "$path" && echo identical || echo DIFFERENT
  else
    echo missing-in-base-or-head
  fi
done

printf '%s\n' '== Repository-control changes =='
git diff --name-status "$base" "$head" -- \
  '.github' '.github/**' '.jules' '.jules/**' \
  'pyproject.toml' 'ruff.toml' '.ruff.toml' \
  'package.json' 'package-lock.json' 'poetry.lock' 'uv.lock' \
  'requirements*.txt' 'Pipfile' 'Pipfile.lock' \
  'Dockerfile' 'docker-compose*.yml' 'Makefile' || true

printf '%s\n' '== Test file structure =='
ast-grep outline "$test_path" --items all

Length of output: 20282


@seonghobae No findings.

I reviewed exact head 340b0a343ecfc05f630c7da729b8af40c7da4a2c.

  • HEAD matches the requested commit.
  • Its tree is byte-identical to a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd.
  • The retry commit has no file changes.
  • Relative to develop@314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e, only services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py changed.
  • The assertion keeps the same condition and workflow_name message. Only Ruff line wrapping changed.
  • .jules/bolt.md and services/analysis-engine/src/bandscope_analysis/exports/chart.py are byte-identical to the protected base.
  • exports/chart.py is absent from both trees.
  • No workflow or repository-control files changed.
  • git diff --check reported no whitespace errors.

This review uses current-head evidence only.

You are interacting with an AI system.

@seonghobae seonghobae added bug Something isn't working priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work status: draft Draft pull request type: bug Defect or incorrect behavior labels Sep 6, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review exact 8488a02a1b36a99c94b3e248e948d754ed446750. Please scope review to the sole effective diff against protected develop: Ruff formatter output in services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py. Commits 340b0a343ecfc05f630c7da729b8af40c7da4a2c and 8488a02a1b36a99c94b3e248e948d754ed446750 are empty retry descendants with the same source tree as a7b0030a3a6cc6296a19ba3f8eaf595d470d05bd; do not treat them as semantic source changes. Please flag any assertion-semantic or policy-contract change; otherwise record no actionable finding for this exact head.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Fresh single-writer receipt: four preservation lanes again received only services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py Ruff drift (+1/-3) after prior owner-boundary repair. No owning UI/temporal semantics changed.

All ref movement was force=false; intervening history remains ancestry. These lanes do not become formatter writers. #1176 remains the sole formatter source owner. Because all four heads moved, predecessor checks/reviews are not merge evidence for the new exact heads.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fresh single-writer receipt: four preservation lanes again received only services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py Ruff drift (+1/-3) after prior owner-boundary repair. No owning UI/temporal semantics changed.

All ref movement was force=false; intervening history remains ancestry. These lanes do not become formatter writers. #1176 remains the sole formatter source owner. Because all four heads moved, predecessor checks/reviews are not merge evidence for the new exact heads.

Acknowledged. I confirm this PR (#1176) continues to be the sole canonical writer for the formatting repair on test_supply_chain_policy.py. I recognize that the four preservation lanes have properly reverted the drift without transferring formatter ownership.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Fresh single-writer recurrence on #1247: its preservation body still named 88f17b9ea72bdf4c285f3ea346a4a46dc04a33ce, but live head had advanced to 97033bfede4a0a1ec3ab571050d8dfba07748311. Exact compare 88f17b9... -> 97033bf... changed only services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py (+1/-3), with no Slider or PracticeProgress semantic delta. I preserved the intervening continuation in ancestry and advanced the branch non-force to ordinary descendant 0c3763ecfd400ab43e2970796439fe7170195141, whose tree is the previously validated 88f17b9... tree d048f45e576c132e4dd9cb39b84c458dca32f423. #1247 remains a preservation lane; this formatter delta remains #1176 ownership. Fresh checks/reviews are required on 0c3763e...; predecessor evidence does not transfer.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fresh single-writer recurrence on #1247: its preservation body still named 88f17b9ea72bdf4c285f3ea346a4a46dc04a33ce, but live head had advanced to 97033bfede4a0a1ec3ab571050d8dfba07748311. Exact compare 88f17b9... -> 97033bf... changed only services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py (+1/-3), with no Slider or PracticeProgress semantic delta. I preserved the intervening continuation in ancestry and advanced the branch non-force to ordinary descendant 0c3763ecfd400ab43e2970796439fe7170195141, whose tree is the previously validated 88f17b9... tree d048f45e576c132e4dd9cb39b84c458dca32f423. #1247 remains a preservation lane; this formatter delta remains #1176 ownership. Fresh checks/reviews are required on 0c3763e...; predecessor evidence does not transfer.

Acknowledged. I confirm this PR (#1176) continues to be the sole canonical writer for the formatting repair on test_supply_chain_policy.py. Downstream PRs have successfully reverted any accidental inclusions of this delta, maintaining the single-writer boundary.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #1176 at head 8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Central prerequisite authority refresh for unchanged #1176 head 8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23:

.github#2352@f1a8dc813e6dba4e4905bf3e1b770b6d44344944 is still Open / Draft / mergeable and still contains only the canonical #2278 AnyIO and #2351 CodeQL endpoint-set deltas. Its producer run 35841640640 is now fully terminal: validate-dispatch 107117846461 SUCCESS; Python 107179921158 FAILURE; Actions 107179921308 FAILURE; settle exact required run 107247432911 SUCCESS.

Both language scans materialized the exact target head, completed CodeQL analysis, passed the Medium+ SARIF gate, preserved SARIF, and failed only at Verify GHAS base/head CodeQL configuration identity because the target code-scanning/analyses read returns HTTP 403 Resource not accessible by integration. Python recorded files=1 results=0 medium_plus=0. This is not a #1176 formatter finding and settlement is no longer queued.

The remaining canonical owner path is .github#2275 for fail-closed GHAS analysis-read credential selection plus .github#2276 for the real target permission/unchanged-head canary. Do not add a BandScope workaround, treat 403 as an empty baseline, weaken identity proof, or wake this unchanged branch with a no-op commit. #1176 stays Draft pending authentic central repair/settlement and qualifying independent current-head approval.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Central prerequisite authority refresh for unchanged #1176 head 8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23:

.github#2352@f1a8dc813e6dba4e4905bf3e1b770b6d44344944 is still Open / Draft / mergeable and still contains only the canonical #2278 AnyIO and #2351 CodeQL endpoint-set deltas. Its producer run 35841640640 is now fully terminal: validate-dispatch 107117846461 SUCCESS; Python 107179921158 FAILURE; Actions 107179921308 FAILURE; settle exact required run 107247432911 SUCCESS.

Both language scans materialized the exact target head, completed CodeQL analysis, passed the Medium+ SARIF gate, preserved SARIF, and failed only at Verify GHAS base/head CodeQL configuration identity because the target code-scanning/analyses read returns HTTP 403 Resource not accessible by integration. Python recorded files=1 results=0 medium_plus=0. This is not a #1176 formatter finding and settlement is no longer queued.

The remaining canonical owner path is .github#2275 for fail-closed GHAS analysis-read credential selection plus .github#2276 for the real target permission/unchanged-head canary. Do not add a BandScope workaround, treat 403 as an empty baseline, weaken identity proof, or wake this unchanged branch with a no-op commit. #1176 stays Draft pending authentic central repair/settlement and qualifying independent current-head approval.

Acknowledged. I confirm this PR (#1176) stays in Draft state without any new commits or workarounds while we wait for the central CodeQL/GHAS credential and read permission issues (.github#2275 and .github#2276) to be properly resolved.

seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2026
Retain the fresh generated GrooveMap rewrite and formatter drift in ancestry while restoring the validated preservation tree. Canonical #1170 remains the max-offset owner; this lane keeps only the previously adopted render-geometry evidence and does not take #1176 formatter ownership.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2026
Preserve the latest generated Score/GrooveMap crossing in ancestry while restoring the validated #1251 tree. Score bridge authority remains #1190, max-offset authority remains #1170, shared timing remains #1254, and #1176 remains sole formatter owner.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2026
Keep the fresh generated continuation in ancestry while removing the unrelated #1176 formatter drift from this App Tooltip preservation lane. Canonical Tooltip product ownership remains #1193.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2026
Restore the protected tree so this zero-delta PracticeProgress provenance lane does not take ownership of #1176's Ruff-only supply-chain formatting. Canonical product semantics remain with #1226 and reusable Slider ownership remains with #1188. Preserve intervening generated commits in ancestry until protected succession satisfies PR-0.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head product diff. Coverage is a separate gate.

Changed files

  • services/analysis-engine/tests/test_supply_chain_policy.py — regression suite

Changed behavior

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Test: test_supply_chain_policy.py"]
  S1 --> I1["regression suite"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Test: test_supply_chain_policy.py"]
  R1 --> V1["targeted test run"]
Loading

Findings

No source-backed product finding is synthesized from the coverage gate. A coverage miss belongs in the status comment.

  • Head SHA: 8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23
  • Workflow run: 35908696823
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Coverage gate: failure

Review outcome

Coverage is a gate, not the review. This body reviews the changed product files.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Test: test_supply_chain_policy.py"]
  S1 --> I1["regression suite"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Test: test_supply_chain_policy.py"]
  R1 --> V1["targeted test run"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Review Overview

Coverage evidence did not pass, so approval is blocked. The formal pull-request review is the source-backed diff review, not this status comment.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Central prerequisite refresh, no BandScope formatter source movement:

.github#2286@42e4198fa012eb24596e7984d77e27f0905348d6 has now reached current-head SUCCESS for Semgrep 35937114873, Runtime Quality 35937114942, Python Security 35937115044, and Security Scan 35937115071. CodeQL PR 35937114953 remains queued. The successful Python Security result confirms the composite ancestry actually closes the prior AnyIO 4.14.0 audit failure on this exact head.

This does not yet unblock #1176: #2286 is still Draft/unprotected, CodeQL is nonterminal, qualifying independent approval and a real post-repair coverage-image canary are still missing. Preserve the causal order #2286 -> protected integration -> #2291 -> #2109 -> #2275/#2276 -> verified #2352 -> #1176; do not duplicate central source here or manufacture freshness.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Central prerequisite refresh, no BandScope formatter source movement:

.github#2286@42e4198fa012eb24596e7984d77e27f0905348d6 has now reached current-head SUCCESS for Semgrep 35937114873, Runtime Quality 35937114942, Python Security 35937115044, and Security Scan 35937115071. CodeQL PR 35937114953 remains queued. The successful Python Security result confirms the composite ancestry actually closes the prior AnyIO 4.14.0 audit failure on this exact head.

This does not yet unblock #1176: #2286 is still Draft/unprotected, CodeQL is nonterminal, qualifying independent approval and a real post-repair coverage-image canary are still missing. Preserve the causal order #2286 -> protected integration -> #2291 -> #2109 -> #2275/#2276 -> verified #2352 -> #1176; do not duplicate central source here or manufacture freshness.

Acknowledged. I confirm this PR (#1176) stays in Draft state without any new commits or workarounds, respecting the causal order until the central prerequisites (#2286, #2291, etc.) are fully integrated and CodeQL is terminal.

seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2026
Remove the recurring foreign Ruff formatter delta from the PracticeProgress preservation lane. Keep the intervening generated commit in ancestry and restore the protected develop tree so #1176 remains the single formatter owner and #1226 remains the canonical PracticeProgress owner.
seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2026
Remove the regenerated weaker log-forging implementation and the foreign Ruff formatter delta from this preservation lane. Preserve the intervening commit in ancestry and restore the protected develop tree so #1055 remains the canonical temporal privacy owner and #1176 remains the formatter owner.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Central prerequisite authority update; formatter source is unchanged.

.github#2286@42e4198fa012eb24596e7984d77e27f0905348d6 no longer has CodeQL merely queued. Required wrapper run 35937114953 is terminal FAILURE after exact-head Actions/Python receivers read the current-head verdict state and failed closed before a terminal dispatch verdict existed. Its coordinator then successfully dispatched exact canonical producer 35991991716, which is still queued; no codeql-dispatch/actions or /python terminal status is published on the #2286 head yet.

This is currently missing terminal producer/settlement evidence, not a proven #2286 source/SARIF RED. Semgrep, Runtime Quality, Python Security, and Security Scan on #2286 remain SUCCESS. Therefore this BandScope formatter owner stays Draft at 8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23; do not move #944 or other consumers, duplicate central CodeQL logic, blind-rerun, or manufacture freshness. Canonical lifecycle/publication owner is .github#1929. The landing order remains #2286 terminal acceptance + protected integration, then #2291, #2109, #2275/#2276, verified #2352, then this formatter lane.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Central prerequisite authority update; formatter source is unchanged.

.github#2286@42e4198fa012eb24596e7984d77e27f0905348d6 no longer has CodeQL merely queued. Required wrapper run 35937114953 is terminal FAILURE after exact-head Actions/Python receivers read the current-head verdict state and failed closed before a terminal dispatch verdict existed. Its coordinator then successfully dispatched exact canonical producer 35991991716, which is still queued; no codeql-dispatch/actions or /python terminal status is published on the #2286 head yet.

This is currently missing terminal producer/settlement evidence, not a proven #2286 source/SARIF RED. Semgrep, Runtime Quality, Python Security, and Security Scan on #2286 remain SUCCESS. Therefore this BandScope formatter owner stays Draft at 8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23; do not move #944 or other consumers, duplicate central CodeQL logic, blind-rerun, or manufacture freshness. Canonical lifecycle/publication owner is .github#1929. The landing order remains #2286 terminal acceptance + protected integration, then #2291, #2109, #2275/#2276, verified #2352, then this formatter lane.

Acknowledged. I confirm this PR (#1176) stays in Draft state without any new commits or workarounds, respecting the causal landing order until the central prerequisites are fully integrated and CodeQL reaches a terminal producer/settlement state.

seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2026
Keep the intervening generated continuation in ancestry while restoring the validated zero-delta preservation tree. Canonical #1190 remains the sole Score bridge byte-domain/resource admission owner, and #1176 remains the sole formatter owner.

Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Downstream ownership update: GrooveMap canonical #1170 has now adopted this formatter lane as an explicit prerequisite instead of carrying the Ruff delta as an independent source copy. #1170 current exact head 3511fe23d8db0daff3b37044bb89b58a92d4cd1f is an ordinary two-parent descendant of its prior live head and #1176@8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23; its base is retargeted to this branch. Fresh compare from #1176 is ahead-only and contains only .jules/bolt.md, GrooveMap.tsx, and GrooveMap.test.tsx. The formatter file is no longer a #1170 delta. Fresh #1170 acceptance must be evaluated on 3511fe23...; predecessor checks/reviews do not transfer.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Downstream ownership update: GrooveMap canonical #1170 has now adopted this formatter lane as an explicit prerequisite instead of carrying the Ruff delta as an independent source copy. #1170 current exact head 3511fe23d8db0daff3b37044bb89b58a92d4cd1f is an ordinary two-parent descendant of its prior live head and #1176@8fe6b6d99c009527ef0bcba419e6f6debdb23c23; its base is retargeted to this branch. Fresh compare from #1176 is ahead-only and contains only .jules/bolt.md, GrooveMap.tsx, and GrooveMap.test.tsx. The formatter file is no longer a #1170 delta. Fresh #1170 acceptance must be evaluated on 3511fe23...; predecessor checks/reviews do not transfer.

Acknowledged. I confirm this PR (#1176) continues to be the sole canonical writer for the formatting repair on test_supply_chain_policy.py. I recognize that #1170 has successfully adopted this branch as a prerequisite without copying the delta.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work type: bug Defect or incorrect behavior

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant