๐จ Palette: ํฅ์๋ ์ ๊ทผ์ฑ์ ์ํด ์์ด์ฝ ๋ฒํผ์ ํดํ ๋ฐ aria-disabled ์ ์ฉ - #731
seonghobae wants to merge 62 commits into
Conversation
|
๐ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a ๐ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Draft PR not reviewedDraft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.
To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration: reviews:
auto_review:
drafts: trueThanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head53ddb4c7452f96594cea0244cda853489fb934b0. -
Head SHA:
53ddb4c7452f96594cea0244cda853489fb934b0 -
Workflow run: 30684374373
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 3
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (7 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (7 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Dismissed after verifying the exact head SHA against the repository's CI, build-baseline, security, SAST, secret-scan, SBOM, Bandit, release, and security-audit workflows; all completed successfully. The automated coverage-evidence review does not identify a remaining code defect on this head.
|
@coderabbitai review |
โ Action performedReview finished.
|
Pull request was converted to draft
Acknowledged. |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current headb12adcdc0c449d845d7d32ac4797a02c822e3653. -
Head SHA:
b12adcdc0c449d845d7d32ac4797a02c822e3653 -
Workflow run: 30822326101
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 3
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (6 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (6 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Dismissed because the only requested change came from the superseded central coverage environment. Exact-head repository checks succeeded and the prior security workflow artifact was removed; a fresh independent current-head approval remains mandatory.
|
@cwl-noema-review @opencode-agent Please independently review exact head |
|
Complete-succession update: autogenerated #1186 |
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
|
Complete-succession receipt: Jules #1196 exact |
|
2026-09-10 overlap sweep: #1200 |
Acknowledged. I will continue to treat this PR (#731) as the sole canonical lane for Score accessibility and proceed without importing the #1200 changes, as the required functionality (focusable |
|
Succession receipt: new Jules PR #1201 exact |
Acknowledged. I understand that the changes from PR #1201 are already fully covered here, and the shared-Button click wrapper is intentionally omitted. I will maintain this canonical Score accessibility lane without importing the #1201 changes. |
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
|
Fresh preservation receipt: #1233 was mutated after the previous adoption receipt. Intervening |
Acknowledged. I confirm that PR #731 remains the canonical owner of these Score accessibility improvements and that the temporary regressions in #1233 (since repaired) do not change our lane here. I will proceed with semantic reconciliation with #1145 as instructed. |
2 participants
Buyer-visible accessibility owner
์ด PR์ Score ์ ์ฅ/ํ์์ PDF pagination์์ unavailable action์ keyboard/AT ์ฌ์ฉ์๊ฐ ๋ฐ๊ฒฌํ ์ ์๊ฒ ์ ์งํ๋ฉด์ activation์ fail closedํ๋ canonical Score accessibility lane์ ๋๋ค.
Exact current identity
develop@314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2efix-score-buttons-1318519530407848765836719ab3b805cc64ce6be70eea35cacb3ce6ad94develop, exactly 12 intended Score UI/test/locales/doctoring/CHANGELOG filesNo force update, destructive rebase, self-approval, gate weakening, predecessor verdict transfer or source-neutral wake commit is used.
Ownership / dependency topology
#1145 is the canonical Tempo Stability + Score/PDF semantic-naming owner. It currently owns the
scorePdfBytes,scoreTranslator,scoreAttachments,selectedScoreAttachment,scoreError, pdf.js adapter naming and temporal naming contract. #731 owns accessibility semantics and must not overwrite those identifiers when both lineages converge.The two Drafts currently share
ScoreView.tsx,ScoreView.test.tsx,ScoreViewer.tsx, andScoreViewer.test.tsxwhile #1145 also owns non-overlapping pdf.js/temporal naming files. Therefore #731 is not merge-ready even if its own checks turn green: before landing, it requires an ordinary, non-force reconciliation/restack onto #1145 or a verified protected successor that preserves both semantic naming and the accessibility contracts below. Until that tree is verified, neither PR is treated as superseded and no overlapping source is closed or discarded.Current product contract
aria-disabled, associate localized recovery copy, and block desktop-bridge mutation.aria-describedbypoints to persistent localized screen-reader-only reason text while application code guards activation.Already at the first page/Already at the last page; KO remains์ฒซ ๋ฒ์งธ ํ์ด์ง์ ๋๋ค/๋ง์ง๋ง ํ์ด์ง์ ๋๋ค.Tooltipcomponent. Enabled page tooltips expose the action; unavailable page tooltips combine action + reason.Escapedismisses visual hover/focus content without deleting the persistent assistive description.titleis not used for the icon-only zoom/page tooltip path. Fit-width and ScoreView enabled action titles remain separate existing semantics.This follows the repository's existing shared-tooltip + persistent
aria-describedbypattern already used by Practice Progress rather than maintaining a second Score-specific tooltip state machine.Shared-tooltip RED โ fix
Fresh review found that this canonical lane still implemented its own tooltip visibility, pointer-hit-testing, geometry and Escape state even though a reusable Base UI-backed tooltip primitive exists. That duplicated UI interaction ownership and left #1233 preserving the reusable-component form in a parallel lane.
e89ba127b18ad9f372ce6796573df36cb372f561requires a persistent assistive boundary reason while hover/focus content is supplied by the shared tooltip and can be dismissed independently.c26fbe4269ca46d9c56db02a30b259ec653e5289removes Score-specific tooltip state/geometry, keepsaria-disabled+ guarded activation + persistentaria-describedbyreasons, and moves zoom/page icon hover/focus content toTooltip/TooltipTrigger/TooltipContent.36719ab3b805cc64ce6be70eea35cacb3ce6ad94makesdocs/doctoring/accessible-disabled-score-navigation.mdcode-current with this division of responsibility.The previous WCAG 1.4.13 RED/fix lineage remains provenance for the requirements that motivated this consolidation, but its custom hover-geometry implementation is no longer duplicated in
ScoreViewer.Preservation / succession
#1233 exact
0995a5ee5093e0a613420cd2034870f56f1e1036preserves shared Tooltip use plus focusablearia-disabledpagination guards. Its valid reusable-component delta is now adopted and strengthened here: this lane additionally retains reason-specific EN/KO copy and a persistent assistive description when the visual tooltip is dismissed. #1233 must remain open while this canonical lineage is unmerged; do not close it merely because the source delta is present here. Only protected integration of a verified successor may satisfy PR-0 for that preservation lane.Earlier succession receipts for #1158, #1162, #1167, #1173, #1178 and #1182 remain valid; their checks/reviews/status do not transfer.
Evidence boundary
Current source contracts verify focusable unavailable controls, boundary activation guards, localized reasons, persistent assistive descriptions, shared-tooltip focus/hover behavior and Escape dismissal. The exact final head must obtain its own hosted CI/build/security/SAST/SBOM/CodeQL and qualifying independent non-author review evidence; predecessor heads do not transfer.
Exact
36719ab3...has fresh repository CI/build/security/SAST/SBOM/CodeQL generations. At the latest read, build matrix jobs had begun on hosted Windows/macOS runners while repositorynpm-lock-validationremained queued; none of those nonterminal states is treated as GREEN.UI Delivery Gate
FAIL. Source/jsdom contracts are stronger and the duplicate tooltip implementation is removed, but current-head packaged browser/Electron pointer/touch/keyboard, 400% zoom/reflow, forced-colors, Narrator/VoiceOver and qualifying independent review evidence are still absent. JA/ZH/VI/ES/DE/FR localization and the versioned translation-ledger requirement also remain outside this Score slice.
Commercial / merge gate
Keep Draft until #1145-or-successor reconciliation is complete and one unchanged exact descendant has all applicable repository/central CI, build, security, SAST, dependency, coverage, SBOM and CodeQL gates terminal-success, zero valid unresolved findings, qualifying independent non-author last-push approval, and satisfiable protected-branch contract. Queued, pending, skipped-required, cancelled, failed, stale, predecessor/base, author/self or administrative-bypass evidence is non-passing.