Repository navigation
Document the handoff from agentic feedback to human review - #4063
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
Conversation
Define contributor and agent checkpoints for handing completed agentic review to human reviewers. Require current-head review evidence, resolved feedback, and adherence to CONTRIBUTING.md.
🎉 All green!🧪 All tests passed 🎯 Code Coverage (details) 🔗 Commit SHA: 7989bc2 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback! |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![datadog-prod-us1-4[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/365230?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
More details
The contributor handoff guidance and additional agent requirements are consistent: agents must verify a completed review of the current PR head and dispositioned feedback before prompting for the label. No actionable defects were identified.
🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit eb59d9b
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: eb59d9be7a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Changes recommended
The workflow does not define removal and reapplication of ready-for-human-review after new pushes, allowing a stale label to signal readiness before the new head is reviewed.
1 open issue
What changed in this PR
This documentation-only PR formalizes the handoff from agentic feedback to human review in the SDK contribution workflow, extending the guidance from #4062.
Changes:
- Defines current-head review, feedback replies, and thread-resolution requirements for
ready-for-human-review. - Adds agent checkpoints, a five-minute grace period, fresh status checks, and user confirmation before labelling.
- Requires agents to follow
CONTRIBUTING.mdand report deferred checks without claiming readiness.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
CONTRIBUTING.md |
Defines contributor requirements for handing a PR to human reviewers. |
AGENTS.md |
Adds agent-specific timing, verification, approval, and handoff procedures. |
Review effort: Balanced
typotter
added
the
ready-for-human-review
|
This seems like a duplicate of #4062, which one to keep? |
@kikoveiga This one we'll keep. I re-opened a copy as a way to test whether the agent would infer a good trigger to add the label |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7989bc21f2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| Before applying the `ready-for-human-review` label, verify that at least one | ||
| agentic or bot review has completed against the current PR head and that no | ||
| agentic reviews remain queued or running. No feedback does not prove that a | ||
| review occurred, and a review of an older revision does not qualify. If an | ||
| expected review has not appeared, eligibility remains unconfirmed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When one bot finishes quickly but another asynchronous review has not yet appeared as queued, these contributor-facing conditions allow the label to be applied immediately because one current-head review exists and no pending review is observable. Require contributors to wait the same five minutes after opening, pushing, or marking the PR ready (restarting after a head change); otherwise they can signal human handoff during the race that the agent-side grace period is designed to prevent.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L288-L291
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6
Bot
added
mergequeue-status: in_progress
and removed
mergequeue-status: queued
labels
gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6
Bot
added
mergequeue-status: done
and removed
mergequeue-status: in_progress
labels
What does this PR do?
Documents the handoff from agentic feedback to human review. Contributors must address or explain feedback, post replies, and resolve associated threads before applying
ready-for-human-review.Adds agent checkpoints, a minimum five-minute review grace period, and verification that a review completed against the current PR head with no reviews still pending. Requires agents to follow CONTRIBUTING.md.
Motivation
Give human reviewers a clear signal that agentic review is complete and its feedback has been handled.
Additional Notes
Documentation-only change, copied from #4062.
Validation passed: formatting, compilation, unit tests, static analysis, test-pyramid coverage, Android lint, dependency licences, API and dependency regeneration, generated-file verification, whitespace and file endings. Foundation returned
allowwith no findings or evaluation errors; Factoryspec configuration and bindings also passed. Foundation coverage excludes unsupported links and anchors. The squash commit is signed.Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)